PDA

View Full Version : Hackers take advantage of Microsoft's JPEG flaw


0zone
10-01-2004, 06:21 PM
Hackers take advantage of Microsoft's JPEG flaw

Tuesday, September 28, 2004

ASSOCIATED PRESS

NEW YORK - In a harbinger of security threats to come, hackers have exploited a newly announced flaw in Microsoft Corp. programs and begun circulating malicious code hidden in images that use the popular JPEG format.

Software tools to create the malicious images began appearing last month, and this week security experts saw images employing them posted on adult-oriented Usenet newsgroups.

To get the malicious code, a visitor must download the image and view it using Microsoft's Windows Explorer software, said Oliver Friedrichs, senior manager with Symantec Security Response.

The computer then contacts a server to obtain code that would let an attacker take over the machine remotely.

Friedrichs said the current exploit is fairly limited but that he expects future attempts to create malicious images that would work on the more popular Outlook and Internet Explorer programs, also made by Microsoft.

The Internet Storm Center at the SANS Institute said an image it found, disclosed on the BugTraq security mailing list, only caused computers to crash in tests, but "we suspect that a working exploit is very close to widespread availability."

Computers with updated versions of anti-virus software should be protected, according to SANS center. Microsoft also has a software patch to fix the flaw and said users who have the Service Pack 2 security update for Windows XP are not affected.

Microsoft disclosed the flaw in question on Sept. 14. It affects people running Windows XP, Windows Server 2003 and later versions of Office.

People who have earlier versions of Windows or Office may also be affected if they are running some specialized applications, such as Digital Image Pro and Visio 2002. The flaw is in a technology that is used to render JPEG images.

0zone
10-01-2004, 06:22 PM
The Next Great Worm Is Coming
By Larry Seltzer
September 28, 2004

Opinion: We've all been warned. Perhaps enough of us will apply the updates, but it looks like the next great Internet worm will be based on Microsoft's GDI+ hole.




Just when mass-mailer worms are becoming an endemic but utterly preventable problem, a whole new wrinkle is developing. Mass-mailer worms based on the Microsoft GDI+ vulnerability will probably slip through most perimeter e-mail protection facilities.

There is a client-side patch for Windows prior to XP Service Pack 2, which itself is not vulnerable, and there is some measure of imperfect protection for third-party programs. The third-party issue is probably not so bad in the short term, but the long term isn't pretty.

Pointer Need to know the news on the latest attacks? Read eWEEK.com's special report "E-Mail Worms 2004."

But the prospect of HTML e-mails—which, though they have no explicit attachments, infect the system and run arbitrary code on them—is extremely troubling to me. Numerous proof-of-concept exploits are appearing and, while I hear at least some of them do not reliably exploit the hole, it's just a matter of time before one comes out that is troublesome enough.

Even though the patch is out there and SP2 users are basically safe, it's hard to feel optimistic. Look at the last great worm, which I figure to be Sasser and its lesser imitations. This was a worm that could be blocked with a patch or at the firewall, and still it caused havoc. There's less that can be done on an administrative basis to stop the coming JPEG worm.

But of the administrative possibilities for stopping this worm, the only practical one is to apply the patch. What else can be done? Disable HTML e-mail? Not practical anymore. Have the anti-virus engine scan JPEG files for the problem? Not practical—the performance hit would be atrocious. There really isn't a good workaround for corporate or home users. The truth of the situation is patch or die.

As I pointed out earlier, the problem of third-party programs that redistribute vulnerable copies of the GDIPLUS.DLL file is a difficult one, but I just don't see it as having the destructive potential of the browser/e-mail side of the problem.


http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1652111,00.asp

JT
10-01-2004, 06:48 PM
Geat info. I'm not sure why you posted it in the Bell and dishnet section though.

indal_98
10-01-2004, 07:24 PM
MicroSoft problem ....heh ..

So what's ...new ?

If you call MicroSoft on WinXP problems...they'll tell you to get lost ....They're STILL working on Win95......bugs....!!!!!

0zone
10-01-2004, 10:50 PM
Geat info. I'm not sure why you posted it in the Bell and dishnet section though.
Thanks JT. Your right it’s off topic .Please Mod move it appropriate section Thanks Oz:rolleyes:

Morpheux
10-01-2004, 10:52 PM
MicroSoft problem ....heh ..

So what's ...new ?

If you call MicroSoft on WinXP problems...they'll tell you to get lost ....They're STILL working on Win95......bugs....!!!!!
Windows 95 has no bugs, those are called "features".

chep
10-02-2004, 03:42 AM
OK... so MS releases SP2 but peeps are hesitant to go to it for the MS bs in it. Then MS lets out that there is a security flaw in the jpeg features of the pre SP2 windows systems thus making it more necces to download and installthe SP2.....HUMMMM makes you think huh!!! :D


chep