PDA

View Full Version : Bill proposed to enforce broadcast flag on digital radio receivers


Crow 492
03-05-2006, 06:35 PM
Bill proposed to enforce broadcast flag on digital radio receivers

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fluffy is right new headling coming in.

When a federal appeals court threw out the broadcast flag regulations from the FCC claiming that they did not have the authority to enforce the broadcast flag for video, the FCC would unlikely get away with a similar enforcement for digital radio. To overcome this, a bill has been proposed by Mike Ferguson which aims to give the FCC the power it needs to enforce measures against unauthorised copying and restriction for both digital terrestrial radio receivers and digital satellite receivers. If this bill gets written into law, it would make it illegal to sell digital radio receivers without government-approved copy-protection technology.

According to Ferguson, this bill is necessary to protect the music industry from potential piracy from recorded radio broadcasts as well as to protect the IP rights of the creators. The RIAA is also interested in having legislation in place to prevent Americans from recording music from digital broadcasts; otherwise they would be able to build a personal music collection from broadcasts or potentially redistribute their recordings over the web or place them on removable media. Unfortunately, for the RIAA and Ferguson, some senators have already expressed their concerns in a hearing that having a broadcast flag for audio would infringe on consumer's fair use rights.

Unlike most analogue radio broadcasts, the majority of digital and satellite radio broadcasts include song and artist information, which makes it very straight forward to exploit for automatically recording and labelling individual songs. Back in 2004, XM Satellite Radio discontinued its PC receiver after software was developed to record individual songs from its broadcasts. Thanks to DamnedIfIknow for letting us know about the following news:

Ferguson's proposal would grant the Federal Communications Commission the power to enforce "prohibitions against unauthorized copying and redistribution" for both digital over-the-air radio and digital satellite receivers.

"With exciting new digital audio devices on the market today and more on the horizon, Congress needs to streamline the deployment of digital services and protect the intellectual property rights of creators," said Ferguson, who is a member of the House of Representatives' Internet subcommittee. Rep. Mary Bono, a California Republican, is one of the four other co-sponsors.

Without explicit authorization from Congress, the FCC can't get away with mandating an audio broadcast flag on its own. That's because a federal appeals court last year unceremoniously rejected a similar set of regulations from the FCC, saying the agency did not have authority to mandate a broadcast flag for digital video.

Digital Radio seems to be one of the few mediums left that the music industry is keen on clamping the notorious DRM technology upon. In my opinion, I cannot see how digital radio without restrictions can make piracy any worse than it is now. If one were to record music from digital radio and make it available online, chances are that the majority of music played on digital radio can be already found on file sharing networks. Even if one decides to try and build a music library from recordings, this has been possible even with analogue radio (albeit more tedious) and so far the music industry has managed to do very well despite how many decades it has been since the first radio-cassette recorder was put on the market!

DamnedIfIknow added: So, first they get it passed for digital radio and then the MPAA will say "Hey, what about digital television? Don't we deserve the same protection?" Great. All your digital entertainment files belong to us!

Crow 492
03-05-2006, 06:37 PM
excerpt from EFF post:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

H.R. 4861 is chilling in at least three ways:

* If this becomes law, you would need a license from the FCC to build a radio receiver and be forced to incorporate DRM if your receiver has a record button. In other words, satisfying the Code of Federal Regulations would come before satisfying your customers.
* Notice that "unauthorized" copying and redistribution will be prohibited, rather than unlawful copying and redistribution. Translation: unless you get permission, it's forbidden, even if it would be a fair use or perfectly legal under the AHRA.
* The bill says that the restrictions "shall not be inconsistent with the customary use of broadcast content by consumers to the extent such use is consistent with the purposes of this act and other applicable law." As we've discussed before, this freezes fair use based on yesterday's "customary uses," rather than leaving room for tomorrow's innovators. Remember, time shifting with your VCR was not "customary" in 1976, nor was platform-shifting CDs to your iPod in 1997.

For a picture of what the RIAA considers permissible, take a look at the comments they filed with the FCC on this topic back in 2004. Here's the list of restrictions they asked for then:

* Receivers may only record or permit recording of covered content: (a) in direct and immediate response to a consumer pressing a record button; (b) based on a date and time preprogrammed by the consumer.

* Preprogrammed recordings shall be for a minimum period of 30 minutes in duration.

* A replay buffer may be used to initiate a recording of a previously broadcast transmission provided that the buffer does not exceed 30 minutes in duration.

* Each recording of covered content shall be stored and retrieved as a singe continuous session and may not be divided into recordings of individual songs on an automated or non-automated basis using ID information or audio characteristics.

* The application of these usage rules to covered content shall be stored and associated in a robust manner with any recordings of such covered content.

* ID information shall be recorded only in a manner that effectively limits its use to display during simultaneous audio playback.

* No recording device shall record covered content based on ID information.

* All recordings of covered content must employ robust encryption methods to bind and limit playback to the recording device.

* Playback of covered content shall be solely on a session basis and shall not be linked in any way to ID information.

* Playback of covered content shall be at normal speed (defined as within 10% of the speed at which the content was originally recorded). Playback may skip forward and backward at higher speeds within the recorded session without playing any sound provided that no skipping, either forward or backward, shall be permitted to the beginning or end of a song using ID information.

"RIAA believes that these rules appropriately balance the interests of users in recording material off-the-air while protecting the interests of the music industry...."

Neither I nor the Copyright Act agrees.