NagraEdit compliant interceptor ?

[Hippie Hackers]

I tried and I tried but I can't write to this card. I unlocked cards before but this one will not budge. I keep getting "Please install a NagraEdit compliant interceptor." After I run Nagra Master Loader Version to unlock the card. I looked through the forms and tried to get it to go with no luck. the card is at rev 103 and when I try using N2 edit I get failed to write

[smilingjack]

Will it read ?
try reading it save the .bin
clean
clean
clean
then write

[Hippie Hackers]

I only clean a code space one time with the other cards and had no problem untill now. Thanks so much. It worked.

[s_gm06]

Thgis will help you in the future alll:rolleyes:





;NEConvert102 1.0 by The Code Warriors
;NagraEdit Intercept Converter ROM102 for NagraEdit 5.0
;================================================= ======================
;
;This D2C script can be used with NagraEdit 5.0 or above to convert a
;ROM102 with the public intercept over to the NagraEdit intercept
;so that it can be read and written in NagraEdit. The script will test
;for the presence of the public intercept and if found will overwrite
;the bugcather table with the new NagraEdit intercept. Once complete,
;the ROM102 can be re-programmed or cleaned in NagraEdit with no need to
;re-glitch the new interceptor code onto the card.
;
;================================================= ======================
RS
CP 3F FF 95 00 FF 91 81 71 .. 47 00 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
JF StartATRInvalid
CP 3F FF 95 00 FF 91 81 71 FF 47 00 44 4E 41 53 50 31 30 32 20 .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
JF BadRomType
TX 21 C1 01 A0 **
WT 00 05
RX
CP 12 .. 01 A0 **
JF BadIFS
TX 21 00 6D A0 CA 00 00 67 04 65 00 00 86 00 AA 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D CC 7A 95 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D BC 88 02 **
WT 00 08
RX
CP 12 .. 04 84 .. 90 00 **
JF BadPublicInterceptTestPrep
TX 21 00 07 A0 FF 00 00 02 48 00 33
WT 00 06
RX
CP 12 .. 02 90 00 **
JS PublicInterceptTestSuccess
CP 12 .. 04 78 .. 90 00 **
JS PublicInterceptNotPresent
JP PublicInterceptTestFailed
:PublicInterceptTestSuccess
TX 21 00 6D A0 CA 00 00 67 04 65 00 00 86 00 AA 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 18 64 A6 4B B7 6B 71 80 CD 7C 16 31 76 9C 08 CC 7A 95 00 00 01 05 05 00 7D 2A 00 88 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D 9D BC 88 02 **
WT 00 08
RX
CP 12 .. 04 84 .. 90 00 **
JF BadWriteBugsPrep
TX 21 00 07 A0 FF 00 00 02 48 00 33
WT 00 06
RX
CP 12 .. 02 90 00 **
JS WriteBugsSuccess
JP WriteBugsFailed
:WriteBugsSuccess
MG Conversion_successful
JP ExitScript
:WriteBugsFailed
MG Writing_new_NagraEdit_interceptor_appears_to_have_ failed
JP ExitScript
:BadWriteBugsPrep
MG Failed_to_prep_for_writing_NagraEdit_interceptor
JP ExitScript
:PublicInterceptTestFailed
MG Public_Intercept_test_failed
JP ExitScript
:PublicInterceptNotPresent
MG Public_Intercept_not_present
JP ExitScript
:BadPublicInterceptTestPrep
MG Failed_to_prep_for_public_intercept_test
JP ExitScript
:BadIFS
MG SetIFS_failed
JP ExitScript
:BadRomType
MG Card_is_not_a_ROM102
JP ExitScript
:StartATRInvalid
MG ATR_at_beginning_appears_to_be_invalid
JP ExitScript
:ExitScript
MG Script_Exiting

[jasjas]

how do you use this ?

[Ohms]

Can anyone tell me technically why cleaning a bin's codespace more than once would have any different effect than cleaning it once??? It makes no sense to me.

[smilingjack]

hahahaha
.
They leave some shit be be-hind
.
I guess it doing it some much on TSOP that is just a matter a doing it on everything.
Works for me, I have never a had a problem doing it 3 times,

[Ohms]

I do understand it on the TSOP cleaning point. I believe that is due to the nature of the serial JTAG connection to the chip, and the lack of error correction built into either the protocol or the application. This is an electro-mechanical (signaling & physical connection) variable that is being addressed. (I think)

I also agree that doing it 100 times would not cause a problem in the cleaning of the codespace of the file.

What I'm confused about it this. It's like a math problem. There is a file loaded into memory. The software will modify this file based on values being placed (or replaced) at specific hexadecimal offsets of the file. I don't see any margin of error here that would cause the results to be inconsistent. I mean 2 + 2 is always going to be 4 no matter how many times you do the calculation right?

LOL I just don't get it, but above, the member states that THIS CURED HIS PROBLEM!!!! I do not doubt that it did cure the problem. Just wondering if anyone could explain how.

[smilingjack]

Well, Charlie can do, the first time, over the air.
But this program was written be hackers, and it must not be right.
It works sometime, but not all the time. LOL
Doing the extra ease help sometimes.
I have recommend to many people, and is usually works !
.
Remember the J-Keys_2_9_11_026 it was written for the 310.
I used it form many years (ignore the error) then someone cone up the the solution, everybody ignored then. IT works error or not. I still recommend it.
.
I mean 2 + 2 is always going to be 4 no matter how many times you do the calculation right?

no, not in this.
We are dealing with a incarcerate program
and made up hardware
with dozens of different computer
and the software is always changing
I am surprised that half of it works at all.

[Hippie Hackers]

You can get all technical as you want but I cleaned the codespace once and it did not work. This is not the first romcard I did. When I cleaned it 3 time it worked. Don't know don't care.Got my porn back.