PDA

View Full Version : TheDSSGuy


Twostep
05-15-2008, 07:18 AM
Quite an interesting read here. Sources say this is the real TDG posting and not one of the impostors that's running around lately posting all manners of crap.

Cut and Paste from Card-Coders.

USEFUL INFORMATION FOR Mr. ZAKARIAN to Fight Dish/Echostar/Nagrastar


First off, I would like to set the record straight by stating the 'other' TDG on this forum is a fake/fraud and imposter taking pot shots at Dish at MY expense.

Second, my guy is a brilliant lawyer (Mr. Zakarian) but he NEEDS all the facts to defend me successfully and also help put the FTA industry on a solid, legal foundation. I will give him some of the facts about Dish piracy here and he can research the details on this forum and others like dsstester as he sees fit.

Dish has a piracy problem, yes, but it is one of their own making and for their own benefit. Although this doesn't excuse anyone from engaging in the piracy of their signal, it also doesn't excuse Dish from trampling all over dealers/importers and manufacturers who produce a perfectly legal product for the consumer electronics market just because this revolutionary new product threatens to take away a big chunk of the satellite business away from the plaintiff.

The history of FTA is one of brilliant innovation and foresight. FTA stands for "free-to-air". What most people in North America don't realize is that probably 75% of all the subscription channels offered by Dish/DirecTV and the cable companies are available for FREE if you have the right equipment and know-how. Of course, Dish and the others
don't want you to know this, much less have the option of buying such equipment to watch tv for free.

So, what can you get for free? Only limited religious programming like Echostar laywers claim? Bullshit! You can reveive literally thousands of channels, including all the major networks like NBC, ABC, CBS, Fox, MyTV, RTN, CWTV, CNBC and hundreds of their affiliates and locals such as WNED, KATV, KCBU, KCWY, KTAL, etc, etc. Interested in
news/business? No problem, you can watch CNN, FoxNews, BloombergTV, ABCNewsNow, BBC, EuroNews and so on. Want time shifting? You got NBC East, NCB Central, NCB Mountain, NBC Pacific - never miss the late show with Jay Leno again! Dish charges "extra" for this privilege. lol.

Interested in specialty channels? Watch National Geographic or the dozens of PBS channels in spectacular HD (best viewed on a SonicView8000). Want to watch the latest blockbuster movies from Hollywood? Tune to the MovieCentral channel on AnikF2 from Canada and watch the latest movies in HD. Interested in sports? Watch FoxSports or Sentana Sports.

Want Adult programming? Tune to PlayboyOne in Europe. If you east far enough, you can also pick up the dozens of FREE adult channels broacasting daily in Europe. Dish charges an arm and a leg for this kind of smut that is 100% FREE.

I haven't mentioned the countless ethnic and other 'niche' channels available for FREE.
Hell, take your FTA to Europe or Asia on vacation and watch all your favourite channels for free there too. Dish offers this service too, it is called the SlingBox, but you have to pay for it and watch the programming on your 13 inch laptop screen. How silly!

Anyone can confirms all the available free channels by going to this site:

hxxp://www.lyngsat.com/freetv/United-States.html (http://www.lyngsat.com/freetv/United-States.html)


So what does the Dish offer that someone can't already get for free? A big FAT monthly subscription, thats what. And Dish lawyers are outright liars when they claim that FTA can only receive limited ethinc programming and by this reasoning the sale of millions of these boxes in North America would be impossible. I would be more than happy to set up a motorized KU/C-band dish ontop of the courthouse in Florida (with the judge's permission) and let the judge flip through all the aforementioned channels on a Viewsat for verification. I'll be sure to blackout the porn channels ahead of time if it is a lady judge. http://www.card-coders.com/forum/images/smilies/icon10.gif


Now comes the piracy part. Dish has been pirated in one form or another for over a decade now, going back to 1998. Wow! That is an awfully long time. Dish has 20,000 employees, thousands of engineers and the ability to put dozens of sophisticated satellites in high earth geosynchronous orbit at a cost of $300 million each, but they can't secure
their signal with all their vast resources? I call BULLSHIT!

Dish WANTS their signal to be pirated. It serves as a very EFFECTIVE advertisement campaign for them. Everyone knows that consumers will go for an "open" system more often than not. It is simply human nature, but it is also massive fraud and deception on the part of Dish management, something the FCC and the authrities need to investigate. In
Canada for example, a $300 million lawsuit has been filed against ExpressVu by cable giant Videotron to stop them from benefitting from their piracy fraud scheme just like Dish does.

Lets examine this fraud in more detail and see the lengths that Dish will go to in order to keep piracy alive. I have been told by a technical expert that since about 2005 (after the Nagra 2 card swap), one very popular method of pirating Dish has been through the use of a modified OEM smartcards from Dish or any countless pirate cards like the atmega128. In order for these pirated cards to work, they must be programmed with a "cloned" Dish account that was subscribed at one point to Dish.

The cloned account everyone is still using today from 2005 is this one:

DishNetwork
SMART CARD ID - S0060436852
RECEIVER ID - 011C746C

ExpressVU
SMART CARD ID - S0455884573
RECEIVER ID - 02AF04CA

Why are these accounts still active by Dish if everyone is using them to pirate their system. Why hasn't Dish performed a simple firmware upgrade to their receivers to blacklist these clone accounts? If a subscriber doesn't pay his monthly bill, Dish will turn off his account very quickly, yet, when 50,000 - 100,000 pirates are using a clone account for over 3 years and Dish does absolutely nothing, this should set off a lot of alarm bells.

In fact, any technical expert will tell you that their security system (Nagra 2) was setup in such a fashion that a hack would only be possible with cloned receiver/smartcard numbers. In the Nagra 1 system, piracy was possible with ANY numbers. So this begs the question, a company with over 20,000 employees and the best security experts in the
world and billions of dollars in resources, comes up with a security system that forces pirates to use cloned account numbers, presumambly so Dish can blacklist these accounts immediately. Yet, it has been three years and counting and the cloned accounts are still just as active today as they were 3 years ago.

Why doesn't Dish blacklist these numbers? If they did, smartcard pirates would be literally out of business overnight or they would have to resort to using their own private numbers from their own account subscriptions and it is highly unlikely that any pirate would publically share his account.

I have also been told by this same technical expert that if pirates resorted to generating their "own" account numbers, Dish could easily detect any key changes in their receiver firmware and disable those receivers. One can logically conclude then, although Dish has a pretty darn good security system in place to prevent smartcard cloning piracy, they simply refuse to use it.

Even more mind boggling, Dish knows the real life identity of one notorious pirate and his associates who have been providing smartcard "fixes" using cloned account information for years, but there is no litigation against him. He readily admits at xxx.satscams.org (http://www.satscams.org/) that his real name is Fred Marshall and that he talks with JJ Gee (Nagra head of
security) on a timely basis. Since Dish won't blacklist these public accounts and talks to the "pirate" coder, I guess the only logical explanation must be that Dish is behind the piracy themselves, much like NDS was "supposedly" behind the piracy of the Nagra 1 smartcard (now being settled in court).

Because there is a lot of money involved, there is a LOT of bullshit going on in this industry!


Now we move to FTA piracy, the only kind of "piracy" that seems to matter to Dish, at least as far as lawsuits go. It is no secret that every major FTA importer/distributor in the USA has been sued by Dish. In addition, dealers, sales pitch men and others involved the industry are being sued too. I happen to be one of them. The whole indsutry is under
legal assault because Dish wants to put FTA out of business. Permanently.

FTA is perfectly legal. The unit is designed to receive free-to-air KU/C-band transmissions that are being broadcast in the clear. IN fact, FTA has been around since the 1970s, whereas Dish got started in 1994. In fact, the CEO if Dish, Charlie Ergen, was an FTA salesman and C-Band dish installer himself back in the late 1970s. Basically, he used
to do my job back in the day, but now he is sueing me because FTA, is a REAL threat to his business.

An FTA unit can be used to pirate Dish ONLY if a third party bin is loaded onto the unit. All the major importers/distributors load these units with FACTORY bins that can only decode free-to-air transmissions. However, some end users are loading third party bins to their units in order to pirate Dish. Thats too bad and Dish should find those people who design such pirate code and prosecute them.

I have also been informed by a technical expert that once again, Dish has the technical ability to disable FTA piracy, but they choose to be lax. Instead, they ride this "wave" of FTA piracy for their own benefit. For example, during the period August 2005 - June 2006, Dish didn't perform a single electronic countermeasure nor attempt to disable any FTA
pirate box in any way, shape or form. This wasn't because they technically couldn't, but because they wanted the FTA piracy community to build up to hundreds of thousands of pirates who were being "hooked" and spoiled by free Dish programming. On or about June 20 2006, Dish activated a new stream revision that rendered all pirate FTA boxes useless
for a period of nearly 2 months, thus proving they had the technical capacity to disable pirate FTA. During this "downtime", it is clear that Dish benefitted enormously from former pirates who decided to go legit and activate an account with them.

During the period September 2006 - October 2007, once again, Dish did absolutely nothing about FTA piracy and it started to flourish again. On or about November 2007, Dish started a campaign of weekly stream changes to disable FTA pirate boxes. And once again, their activations surged.

The bottom is that this 'cat-and-mouse' game is all about money and shareholder quarterly reports. Even though it is generally accepted that rival DirecTV offers superior programming and more HD channels than Dish, it seems like during the period 2005-2008, Dish new subs have been surging ahead, whereas they had always been way behind DirecTV prior to this period.

Technically, I have been told that Dish can stop FTA piracy if they wanted to with agressive receiver firmware updates in conjunction with smartcard revisions that would utilize a subscriber's private account information to encrypt the keys in such a way that a subbed account would actually be needed in an FTA pirate bin to still work. In fact, the
Canadian provider ExpressVU utilized this method effectively to secure the NFL ticket from all pirate FTA boxes. The only reason it seems they did this was to be in compliance with their NFL contract that states the contract is void if the NFL signal is pirated. Thus, more proof that Nagra can secure their signal, but only do so when they "have" to by law or legal contracts or whatever. But it doesn't matter if they have no such agreement with all the other media providers...they just prostitute those signals away for free because they are not liable for any damages.

Well, that is basically it. I hope Mr. Zakarian has a starting point to begin his legal research into Dish piracy and throw the book at them for being so complicit in this piracy.

The FCC and people in Congress need to know about Dish's so called "piracy" problem and how they at the same time they exploit the situation for their own gain and are trying to bully the FTA industry into shutting down.
__________________
They have a LOT to prove.

-theDSSguy

steve341
05-15-2008, 05:32 PM
very interesting read. I got my FTA receiver going yesterday on BEV, but I will try and look for all these channels in true FTA.

rg6a
05-15-2008, 06:27 PM
Just checked and Albert Apgar Zakarian is registered in Florida and his office is in Lithia (suburb of Tampa) and graduated law school in 1995. He is a sole owner, hence one man office, so that much is genuine.

My buddy in Australia uses an outside antenna for tv and it's called 'free to air' everywhere outside of N.America..........hence the name of free signals that these FTA factory flashed irds can capture off satellite.

Both Charlie & Dave are in a price war, and a friend of mine in FL. was a Charlie sub for years (H/Hu days) and always thought that D*sh was superior on account of two sats.

When I sent him a loader and an h* card and instructions, he quickly changed his opinion. ;-)

(he UPS'd me his legacy 500 & 2700 with a Thank You Note)



The concept of any provider allowing piracy is nonsense, thing is.....if you kill a cloned card...........the legitimate card goes down. Also Providers don't do the Security, that's what ND* and N*gra are for.


With the swapout going on, dunno why they're chasing down this guy...........like he will be able to pay a six figure fine?

The writing and spelling certainly didn't come from a sixteen year old living in his parent's basement. It read and looked Legit.


That and $3 will get you some kind of crappa' frappa' thing at Starsucks.

zhakrin
05-15-2008, 06:46 PM
The concept of any provider allowing piracy is nonsense, thing is.....if you kill a cloned card...........the legitimate card goes down. Also Providers don't do the Security, that's what ND* and N*gra are for.



This isn't quite accurate. You send the legitimate sub a replacement card, then kill the clone.

mili
05-15-2008, 07:46 PM
No that is not correct. Without the legit card ever being dumped you don't get the info you cna use in FTAs. If a card dump is a fact have that legit user disconnected and explain how the fuck his card's BIN ended up on the Internet? Obviously the card in question is anything but legitimate so can be turned off immediately then sort it out how and why did it end up in FTA boxes.

mili

bud02
05-15-2008, 08:15 PM
That is all good and true Mili, but it still begs The question, why can DN desub a card# for non payment but not desub public #s. The only answer I can see is that the desub command lies in the card its self. That being the case a blocker on cam would or could prevent this, but would not explaine why FTAs and 128s could not be affected or even ST19. As far as I know these devices dont use any bin or code protection.

pecker88
05-15-2008, 08:53 PM
more food for thought...
Why the fuck does dish include the PPV id's in the description of the event? Does this serve any purpose, other then helping us set ppv ranges?

JT
05-15-2008, 09:25 PM
more food for thought...
Why the fuck does dish include the PPV id's in the description of the event? Does this serve any purpose, other then helping us set ppv ranges?

I have to assume that's so a legit customer can keep track of what they ordered in the same way the provider does; by the event ID.

I have mixed feelings about this entire discussion. I remember the TDG that was so annoying prior to his current legal situation. Granted, this guy isn't being annoying and is actually bringing up some pretty good points. But, what difference does it make? Only thing that's going to make any difference is how Ward's case turns out in the end. The arguments are irrelevant.

I doubt you'll see me posting much more in this discussion or those like it anywhere else. I hope TDG's case goes well for him, but it's not because I want to see him stick around in this hobby.

smilingjack
05-15-2008, 09:34 PM
The de-sub work on the IRD number
They simply say this IRD # won't work anymore (till he pays)
You have to change the IRD # to get it working again.
been there,
If the dealers get one, they charge one, I got one, it got a sticker on top, that says "cleaned"
.
The could shut off the public numbers for both dish & bev (cemu and ST19) in 1 minutes, simply by black list the public numbers.

They have never bother them.

wilmero
05-15-2008, 11:27 PM
Let me just say that I've spoken with TDG and he informed me that this post is NOT his work but rather the imposter TDG.

Whoever it was, must have spent all night on it.

frumpulous
05-15-2008, 11:46 PM
Let me just say that I've spoken with TDG and he informed me that this post is NOT his work but rather the imposter TDG.

Whoever it was, must have spent all night on it.

i dont know tdg personally, but i knew this wasnt his when i read it. look at his spelling of "favourite". hes not canadian or british; hes from florida.

all of these ramblings would in no way help tdg's legal defense, in fact it would very much hurt it as it shows his cards. you cant offer a defense to theft by saying the retailer wanted you to steal it therefore the retailer is guilty.

dont put any stock into any of this crap.

JT
05-16-2008, 01:12 AM
In another thread at cc, this version of TDG posted this in response to a post:

hxxp://www.card-coders.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3902&page=2

================================================== ================================================== ==================

theDSSguy
Novice Researcher Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11

[/QUOTE]
Originally Posted by Sum1New
To me it would seem smart as hell to have all these phony TDG's post everywhere. We all know which ones are phony, but it sure would make for an interesting argument in a court of law when DN tries to use website postings as evidence. Anyone can be anybody. Proof would then be up to DN to identify which TDG posted what.[QUOTE]

You got that right.

kronicSJ
05-16-2008, 02:02 AM
I believe it may be the real TDG, I mean letz face it HE'S PLUGGING THE SV8000,
THATZ TDG, plug a sale ANYWHERE you can,....

I also believe alot of it IS BS,
DN and bev most likely pay for broadcasting rights for a majority of the chans. they offer in theri pkg.'s, and are allowed to legaly encrypt their signal to secure their subs,
and hacking/breaking that encryption can/may be the same as patching a cable line into a cable tv router to steal their signal or modding a cable tv box to bypass the ppv and premium chan. filters/blockers, or disabling the two-way com with the cable company,
also as far as DN not blacklisting those specific camz I can't explain,
but I can say that last summer that alot of public camz DID get blacklisted, so DN DOES INDEED STILL blacklist camz,
TDG's grasping at straws, right at this point a judge can swing it either way because the cases that are going to court WILL be "precident setting" cases because everything has changed with the OVERFLOW of FTA,

it will be REAL interesting to see how this all REALLY developes in the courts,
my guess is that ppl will wind up paying BIG BUX in the longrun, JMO,....

HCCAfan
05-16-2008, 06:04 AM
those public cams didnt get blacklisted, they got targeted for ecm's. big difference....

chemlab
05-16-2008, 06:21 AM
Real or not, does anyone really care what TDG has to say other than the entertainment value of laughing at an idiot?

HCCAfan
05-16-2008, 06:41 AM
exactly chemlab. in a criminal court some of this might hold water, but in civil court, he's got less of a chance. he's been linked or else he wouldnt be in the position he's in now....

spanga
05-16-2008, 07:56 AM
exactly chemlab. in a criminal court some of this might hold water, but in civil court, he's got less of a chance. he's been linked or else he wouldnt be in the position he's in now....nonetheless, in either case one should probably argue. I'm pretty sure a laydown is is not quite the way to go.

cave_man
05-16-2008, 05:59 PM
I believe it may be the real TDG, I mean letz face it HE'S PLUGGING THE SV8000,
THATZ TDG, plug a sale ANYWHERE you can,....

....

LMAO exactly . :D

wilmero
05-16-2008, 08:05 PM
I believe it may be the real TDG, I mean letz face it HE'S PLUGGING THE SV8000,
THATZ TDG, plug a sale ANYWHERE you can,....



Actually, TDG himself would have plugged a VS9000 before he plugged a SV8000. He is not a SV spokesperson, everyone knows that.

DB
05-18-2008, 09:35 PM
That is all good and true Mili, but it still begs The question, why can DN desub a card# for non payment but not desub public #s. The only answer I can see is that the desub command lies in the card its self. That being the case a blocker on cam would or could prevent this, but would not explaine why FTAs and 128s could not be affected or even ST19. As far as I know these devices dont use any bin or code protection.Dish and BEV can send out a desub command. The reason the public numbers will not be stopped by this is because of the use of a blocker. The card will just keep on kicking cause it never got the command. Thats one reason that a blocker is used. FTA, atmegas will also not be effected by this. BEV has send out desub commands in the past for it's public numbers. This only stopped people running blockerless , Emu, and people running blockerless on the armulator.


Dish and BEV can not black list like Directv used to do back in the HU days. They can't just shut the account off and expect it to take out everyone running that key set. It won't happen.

t160hq
05-26-2008, 06:34 AM
I personally have 18 sets of keys of various model desubbed receivers.

I could release 15 tomorrow and still have 3 they don't know about.

I don't think I am unique in that. So shutting down the public numbers
would be a temp measure at best. Even now I don't think they have
the bandwith to constantly send desub commands to 10,000+ additional
units on a daily or weekly basis. I suspect it would have to be daily to be
really effective.

Actual desubbed units in the field likely approach the million mark or more
by now. Especially with upgrades to HDTV. To save a buck instead of having all
those desubs sent back (or at least the cams) for security reasons they allowed the customers or installers to just throw em away or sell em.

I think the public numbers still work for the simple reason the horse has
already left the barn to late to lock the door now.

I agree Di$h has a lot of people who know a great deal about modern
high tech security. Lucky for us they got so rapped up in that they failed
to protect from low tech testing. DTV learned that lesson and changed
their methods. Di$h is running around like the genius that dosen't have
enough common sense to eat and starves to death.

t160hq

Biggen1
05-27-2008, 02:19 AM
Look @ the Join Date of Most of the entries





Wow..............













Best read in a long time:cool:









.